Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1532273
 
 

Footnotes (79)



 


 



Does Anyone Really Want a Parliament of Man?


Kenneth Anderson


American University - Washington College of Law; Stanford University - The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace; Brookings Institution - Governance Studies


Goettingen Journal of International Law, Vol. 1, pp. 539-566, 2009
American University, WCL Research Paper 2010-05

Abstract:     
This is a review-essay of historian Paul Kennedy's recent history of the UN and global governance, The Parliament of Man. It offers a critical look at Kennedy's account of the development of the UN as the gradual, if fitful, progress of the United Nations towards global governance under an order of liberal internationalism - the slow triumph of international institutions and law over the the anarchy of international power politics among sovereign states.

The essay argues that what Kennedy views as the gradual movement toward global governance by the UN, or international institutions of any kind, in the truly crucial matters of international security is actually an artifact of US hegemony, which offers the world a set of global public goods and minimal order. The extra-UN provision of these global public goods by the United States provides the otherwise missing exit from the classic problem of collective security - insincere promising, defection, and free-riding. The essay argues that Kennedy is essentially a "Whig historian" - positing a progress to history based around notions of global governance. It urges that the embrace of democratic sovereignty, with robust multilateralism among sovereigns, as an ideal political position, over internationalist global governance premised upon an indefinitely receding future in which universal, utopian, international organizations and law will overcome and replace sovereignty.

Meanwhile, the "decline of the US" thesis and rise of multipolarity, celebrated by many as leading to a more just global order, should in fact give great pause, because a multipolar world is a more competitive, not more cooperative world. And the "universal" values of human rights might turn out, in retrospect, to have been far less a condition of international organizations and law and far more a benefit of US hegemony.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: United Nations, UN, Paul Kennedy, Parliament of Man, global governance, international law, multipolarity, Security Council, hegemony, international security, sovereignty, multilateralism, engagement

JEL Classification: K33

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 6, 2010 ; Last revised: March 11, 2010

Suggested Citation

Anderson, Kenneth, Does Anyone Really Want a Parliament of Man?. Goettingen Journal of International Law, Vol. 1, pp. 539-566, 2009; American University, WCL Research Paper 2010-05. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1532273

Contact Information

Kenneth Anderson (Contact Author)
American University - Washington College of Law ( email )
4801 Massachusetts Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20016
United States
Stanford University - The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace
Stanford, CA 94305-6010
United States
Brookings Institution - Governance Studies
1775 Massachusetts Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20036
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,066
Downloads: 195
Download Rank: 86,551
Footnotes:  79

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.406 seconds