What’s Next? Judging Sequences of Binary Events
Leaf Van Boven
University of Colorado Boulder
An T. Oskarsson
University of Colorado at Boulder
University of Colorado at Boulder - Department of Psychology
University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 135, No. 2, pp. 262-285, 2009
The authors review research on judgments of random and nonrandom sequences involving binary events with a focus on studies documenting gambler’s fallacy and hot hand beliefs. The domains of judgment include random devices, births, lotteries, sports performances, stock prices, and others. After discussing existing theories of sequence judgments, the authors conclude that in many everyday settings people have naive complex models of the mechanisms they believe generate observed events, and they rely on these models for explanations, predictions, and other inferences about event sequences. The authors next introduce an explanation-based, mental models framework for describing people’s beliefs about binary sequences, based on 4 perceived characteristics of the sequence generator: randomness, intentionality, control, and goal complexity. Furthermore, they propose a Markov process framework as a useful theoretical notation for the description of mental models and for the analysis of actual event sequences.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24
Keywords: hot hand, streaks, gambler’s fallacy, binary sequence, Markov processAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 20, 2010
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.843 seconds