|
||||
|
||||
Modular Confines of Mobile Networks: Are Iphones Iphony?Thomas W. HazlettGeorge Mason University Dept. of Economics and School of Law May 7, 2009 George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 10-01 3rd Annual Conference on the Law and Economics of Innovation, May 2009 Abstract: Strategic investments by wireless carriers and others are generating rapid development of the “mobile ecology,” increasing modularity even while embracing and extending vertical controls. Coordination among complementary asset owners and simultaneous rivalry among platforms suggests that the process of creative destruction is robust. Moreover, innovation “at the edge” is vibrant, with smartphone suppliers Research in Motion (Blackberry), Apple (iPhone), Google (gPhone), among others, driving carrier strategies. That vertical network policies help generate welfare gains is apparent via revealed consumer preferences, the advanced state of technology under “strong bundling” in Japan, and the fact that even ostensibly “open” platforms retain an important measure of vertical control, efficiencies yielding value in rivalry against competing platforms.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32 Keywords: AOL, AT&T, application platforms, business models, Carterfone, cellular, choice, FCC, Federal Communications Commission, marketplace, Microsoft, monopoly, Motorola, Nokia, Palm, price system, regulation, Ronald Coase, Timothy Wu, vertical integration JEL Classification: K23, L14, L26, L51, L63, L96 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 8, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.453 seconds