Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1534282
 
 

Citations (6)



 
 

Footnotes (181)



 


 



Trolls or Market-Makers? An Empirical Analysis of Nonpracticing Entities


Sannu K. Shrestha


Columbia University - Law School

November 22, 2009

Columbia Law Review, Vol. 110, p. 114, 2010

Abstract:     
Nonpracticing entities (NPEs) are firms that rarely or never practice their patents, and instead focus on earning licensing fees. NPEs may have patented inventions on their own or bought the patents from other inventors. NPEs have been the subject of much controversy over the past few years. Critics of these firms have labeled them “patent trolls” and claim that they use weak and vague patents to extract excessive licensing fees or to engage in frivolous infringement litigation against product manufacturers. NPEs and their supporters, on the other hand, claim that these firms enhance innovation and competition by providing capital to independent inventors and creating an efficient market for trade in technological information. This Note uses patent data from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) and infringement litigation information from Stanford Law School’s Intellectual Property Litigation Clearinghouse (IPLC) to test some of the arguments made for and against NPEs and to determine whether these firms benefit or harm innovation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: Patent, Nonpracticing Entity, Patent Value, Patent Infringement Litigation, Patent Troll

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 12, 2010 ; Last revised: May 25, 2014

Suggested Citation

Shrestha, Sannu K., Trolls or Market-Makers? An Empirical Analysis of Nonpracticing Entities (November 22, 2009). Columbia Law Review, Vol. 110, p. 114, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1534282

Contact Information

Sannu K. Shrestha (Contact Author)
Columbia University - Law School ( email )
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,150
Downloads: 763
Download Rank: 16,959
Citations:  6
Footnotes:  181
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds