Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1534778
 
 

References (58)



 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Auditors' Reactions to Inconsistencies between Financial and Nonfinancial Measures


Joseph F. Brazel


North Carolina State University - Poole College of Management - Department of Accounting

Keith L. Jones


George Mason University

Douglas F. Prawitt


Brigham Young University

August 8, 2012


Abstract:     
Nonfinancial measures (NFMs), such as employee headcount and production space, are operational measures that are not included on the face of the financial statements but are often disclosed elsewhere in the annual report or 10-K (e.g., in Management’s Discussion and Analysis). Professional standards, auditing texts, and prior research suggest that external auditors can use NFMs to verify their clients’ reported financial information and, in turn, improve audit quality. In an initial experiment where auditors were asked to develop an expectation for a client’s sales balance, they generally failed to identify a seeded inconsistency between the client’s sales and related NFMs. In a second experiment, we find that auditors are more likely to react to the inconsistency (i.e., rely more on inconsistent NFMs / develop expectations that reflect the client’s current year decline in NFMs) when they are specifically prompted to consider the implications of NFMs and fraud risk is high (vs. low). Our results suggest that (1) a minority of auditors use NFMs as a source of information for testing and do not increase their reliance on NFMs when the NFMs point to a fraud red flag; (2) the presence of high fraud risk alone is insufficient to increase auditor consideration of inconsistent NFMs; (3) auditors are able to react appropriately to an inconsistency if they are effectively prompted; and (4) even a prompt that explicitly highlights an inconsistency is unlikely to improve auditor performance unless the prompt is processed in a high fraud risk setting.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 42

Keywords: analytical procedures, auditor, fraud, non-financial measures

JEL Classification: M40, M41

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 11, 2010 ; Last revised: October 23, 2012

Suggested Citation

Brazel, Joseph F. and Jones, Keith L. and Prawitt, Douglas F., Auditors' Reactions to Inconsistencies between Financial and Nonfinancial Measures (August 8, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1534778 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1534778

Contact Information

Joseph F. Brazel (Contact Author)
North Carolina State University - Poole College of Management - Department of Accounting ( email )
Campus Box 8113
Nelson Hall
Raleigh, NC 27695
United States
919-513-1772 (Phone)
Keith Lamar Jones
George Mason University ( email )
4400 University Drive
Fairfax, VA 22030
United States
703-993-4819 (Phone)
703-993-1809 (Fax)
Douglas F. Prawitt
Brigham Young University ( email )
Provo, UT 84602
United States
801-422-2351 (Phone)
801-422-0621 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,500
Downloads: 946
Download Rank: 12,142
References:  58
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.422 seconds