Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1534904
 
 

Footnotes (76)



 


 



Rationality in an Unjust World: A Research Agenda


Claire A. Hill


University of Minnesota, Twin Cities - School of Law

December 15, 2009

Queen's Law Journal, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2009
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-02

Abstract:     
The decision to forsake large or long-term benefits, or incur large costs, for small, short term benefits is often referred to as irrational, as are people who make such a decision. The author suggests that some people making these “irrational” decisions may have a rational basis that derives from a view that the world is unjust or not just. Policy-makers’ main tool to influence socially undesirable behaviour is to assess penalties such as monetary fines or prison sentences. The author contends that for people who do not hold a just world view, this approach may be less effective than policy-makers believe it to be. Following a detailed examination of the literature on just and unjust world views, the author defines a “just enough” world view, according to which people believe the world is sufficiently just that they behave as if it is just. This, she argues, is the world view that lawmakers and policy-makers assume people to have. She then considers how cost-benefit computations differ as between someone with a just enough world view and someone who believes that the world is not just enough. People may assess the benefits of an action offering short-term benefits but long-term costs similarly, whatever their world view. But people who think the world is not just enough may assess the costs of such an action to be much lower. They may think that whatever they do, they could be penalized; they may compute the additional penalty for the action offering the short-term benefit as comparatively small. Policy-makers fail to take this into account. Finally, the author encourages further research to determine how people who do not believe the world is just enough may respond differently to law’s attempts to influence their behaviour.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: rationality, just world belief

JEL Classification: D84, K42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 12, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Hill, Claire A., Rationality in an Unjust World: A Research Agenda (December 15, 2009). Queen's Law Journal, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2009; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1534904

Contact Information

Claire Ariane Hill (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities - School of Law ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-624-6521 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 933
Downloads: 112
Download Rank: 144,461
Footnotes:  76
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.297 seconds