First Amendment Interests and Copyright Accommodations
David S. Olson
Boston College Law School
January 11, 2010
Boston College Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 5, 2009
Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 184
Copyright law exists to encourage the creation of works of authorship by granting exclusive rights. But copyright’s incentive function seems in tension with the public’s First Amendment interests to use and freely hear copyrighted speech. Conventional wisdom holds, however, that copyright law serves to encourage much more speech than it discourages, and resolves First Amendment concerns with protections internal to copyright law like the fair use defense and the idea/expression dichotomy. This Article argues that the conventional wisdom no longer holds given the unprecedented expansion of copyright’s scope and cor-responding drastic diminution of the public domain in the last three decades. This Article extends the U.S. Supreme Court’s reasoning in Eldred v. Ashcroft, which rejected the notion that courts should never subject copyright laws to First Amendment analysis, to read First Amendment accommodations into copyright laws where use of copyrighted materials implicates significant speech interests.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 33
Keywords: Eldred v. Ashcroft, traditional contours of copyright, Golan v. HolderAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 14, 2010
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.609 seconds