Footnotes (177)



First Amendment Interests and Copyright Accommodations

David S. Olson

Boston College Law School

January 11, 2010

Boston College Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 5, 2009
Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 184

Copyright law exists to encourage the creation of works of authorship by granting exclusive rights. But copyright’s incentive function seems in tension with the public’s First Amendment interests to use and freely hear copyrighted speech. Conventional wisdom holds, however, that copyright law serves to encourage much more speech than it discourages, and resolves First Amendment concerns with protections internal to copyright law like the fair use defense and the idea/expression dichotomy. This Article argues that the conventional wisdom no longer holds given the unprecedented expansion of copyright’s scope and cor-responding drastic diminution of the public domain in the last three decades. This Article extends the U.S. Supreme Court’s reasoning in Eldred v. Ashcroft, which rejected the notion that courts should never subject copyright laws to First Amendment analysis, to read First Amendment accommodations into copyright laws where use of copyrighted materials implicates significant speech interests.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: Eldred v. Ashcroft, traditional contours of copyright, Golan v. Holder

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 14, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Olson, David S., First Amendment Interests and Copyright Accommodations (January 11, 2010). Boston College Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 5, 2009; Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 184. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1534968

Contact Information

David S. Olson (Contact Author)
Boston College Law School ( email )
885 Centre Street
Newton, MA 02459-1163
United States
617-552-1378 (Phone)
617-552-4098 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,131
Downloads: 178
Download Rank: 126,861
Footnotes:  177
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.391 seconds