The Record of the Roberts Court in Environmental Cases: Pro-Business or Pro-Government?
Jonathan H. Adler
Case Western Reserve University School of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center
January 12, 2010
Engage, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2010
Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2010-4
Drawing upon a preliminary analysis of the Roberts Court’s decisions in environmental cases prepared for a January 2009 Santa Clara Law Review symposium on “Big Business and the Roberts Court,” this essay assesses claims that the Roberts Court has shown itself to be particularly “pro-business” and hostile to environmental protection. A review of all eighteen environmental cases decided by the Roberts Court in its first four years finds little evidence of any “pro-business” inclination. Victories for business interests are balanced by losses. The Roberts Court’s environmental decisions may provide evidence for something else, however: a tendency to side with government agencies and state interests. While there is little evidence the Roberts Court is “pro-business” or “anti-environment,” there is some evidence to suggest it is “pro-government.”
Number of Pages in PDF File: 19
Keywords: Roberts Court, United States Supreme Court, Environmental Law, Business Interests, Government Interests
JEL Classification: K23, K32Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 12, 2010 ; Last revised: April 16, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.437 seconds