Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1536527
 
 

Footnotes (13)



 


 



Why Regulators Must Fight 'Control Fraud' Like Public Health Specialists


William K. Black


University of Missouri at Kansas City - School of Law

January 14, 2010


Abstract:     
“Control fraud” is the leading cause of bank failures and financial crises. In “control fraud” the persons controlling a seemingly legitimate entity use it as a weapon to defraud. This essay analyzes the role of regulators in two epidemics of control fraud: the savings & loan debacle of the 1980s and the ongoing financial crises that first became acute in the nonprime mortgage sector.

Effective regulation is essential to prevent and contain such epidemics. An epidemic is the natural outcome of a “pathogenic environment” which requires a reservoir of hosts for the pathogens to infect, and “vectors” to spread the pathogen. The anopheles mosquito is a vector for malaria.

The financial world incurs epidemics of fraud when there is a “criminogenic environment.” Factors that make an environment criminogenic include non-regulation, assets that lack verifiable values, and compensation systems that create perverse incentives. The vectors of such epidemics include rating agencies, accounting firms, and appraisers. The symptoms include financial bubbles. They aid accounting fraud by creating fictional income to hide real losses. This feature of bubbles is analogous to infectious disease. Symptoms (coughing, sneezing) both spread disease and weaken the host, making him more susceptible to other infections.

Effective regulation is essential to prevent epidemics of accounting fraud. Economists who determine regulatory policy have operated like faith healers instead of public health specialists. Their policies create, rather than prevent, criminogenic environments. They did so in the S&L debacle, the Enron/WorldCom scandals, Russian privatization, and “The Washington Consensus.”

Economists’ failures are particularly tragic because there was a brief period (1983-1987) when regulators did act like public health officials. Those actions are largely unknown, as are the regulatory and Justice Department actions in 1990-92 that produced the largest number of convictions of white-collar criminals in U.S. history and prevented a subprime lending crisis.

The Clinton and Bush administrations seemed unaware of these regulatory successes. Their deregulatory policies produced a criminogenic environment. Ending effective financial regulation was a key step in producing that environment and delaying the diagnosis of the resulting epidemic of mortgage fraud and other forms of accounting control fraud.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: Corporate law, Financial crisis, Financial regulation, Banking, Banking regulation, Securities, Securities regulation, Control fraud, Fraud

JEL Classification: K14, K22, K23, K42, G18, G28, G38

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 15, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Black, William K., Why Regulators Must Fight 'Control Fraud' Like Public Health Specialists (January 14, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1536527 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1536527

Contact Information

William K. Black (Contact Author)
University of Missouri at Kansas City - School of Law ( email )
5100 Rockhill Road
Kansas City, MO 64110-2499
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 753
Downloads: 203
Download Rank: 89,188
Footnotes:  13

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.328 seconds