Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1536538
 
 

Footnotes (47)



 


 



'Duty-Defining Power' and the First Amendment's Civil Domain


Timothy Zick


William & Mary Law School

January 14, 2010

William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-27
Columbia Law Review - Sidebar, Vol. 109, No. 116, 2009

Abstract:     
In Rethinking Free Speech and Civil Liability, 109 Colum. L. Rev. 1650 (2009), Daniel Solove and Neil Richards seek to map coherent boundaries for the First Amendment’s vast civil domain. Currently, different rules apply to civil liability for speech depending on whether the liability arises in tort, contract, or property. Solove and Richards claim that these boundaries are unworkable, under-theorized, and in some cases destined to collide. They develop a framework for mapping the First Amendment’s civil domain that is based upon a distinction regarding the type of power the state exercises in various civil liability contexts. This brief response critically examines the choice and meaning of power, and the boundaries that a power-defining approach would draw.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: civil liability, freedom of speech

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 16, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Zick, Timothy, 'Duty-Defining Power' and the First Amendment's Civil Domain (January 14, 2010). William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-27; Columbia Law Review - Sidebar, Vol. 109, No. 116, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1536538

Contact Information

Timothy Zick (Contact Author)
William & Mary Law School ( email )
South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
757-221-2076 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 386
Downloads: 39
Footnotes:  47

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.235 seconds