Abstract

 


 



Misplaced Fears in the Legislative Battle Over Affordable Biotech Drugs


David E. Adelman


University of Texas School of Law; University of Texas - School of Law, The Center for Global Energy, International Arbitration, and Environmental Law

Christopher M. Holman


University of Missouri - Kansas City School of Law

January 14, 2010

IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2010
Energy Center Research Paper No. 12-01

Abstract:     
Much like tort reform, the debate over pending legislation on biotech drugs - and particularly regulatory supplements to patent protection - has taken on a significance that dwarfs its impact on overall health care expenditures. Under the pending Health Care Reform legislation, Congress would enact two major reforms: First, creation of an abbreviated Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval process for follow-on biologics, which are the analogues of generics for conventional drugs. Second, establishment of a twelve-year “data exclusivity” period during which clinical testing data collected by brand-name producers could not be used by competitors to satisfy FDA testing requirements. While the abbreviated FDA approval process enjoys broad support, the data-exclusivity provision has been hotly contested, including strong opposition from the Federal Trade Commission.

We argue that regulatory data exclusivity is a sideshow. Current estimates find that the effect of data exclusivity on health care expenditures would be trivial. For this and other reasons, any potential benefit to patients that might result from a shorter period of data exclusivity would be outweighed by the financial risks to the biotech industry, and particularly the negative impacts on investments in research and development. More importantly, we believe that the current focus on data exclusivity is misplaced. Weak competition in markets for biotech drugs poses a much greater and longer-term problem for patient access - without effective competition, pricing of many biotech drugs will remain high indefinitely. The most important issue for Congress to address ought to be minimizing the barriers to market entry for manufacturers of follow-on biologics after the relevant patent terms and data exclusivity end. We close the article by suggesting a variety of ways in which this objective could be met.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: Biotechnology, Biologics, Patents, FDA, Health Care Reform

JEL Classification: O33, I18, K29, K39

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 15, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Adelman, David E. and Holman, Christopher M., Misplaced Fears in the Legislative Battle Over Affordable Biotech Drugs (January 14, 2010). IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2010; Energy Center Research Paper No. 12-01. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1536681 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1536681

Contact Information

David E. Adelman (Contact Author)
University of Texas School of Law ( email )
727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States
512-232-0877 (Phone)

University of Texas - School of Law, The Center for Global Energy, International Arbitration, and Environmental Law ( email )
Austin, TX
United States

Christopher M. Holman
University of Missouri - Kansas City School of Law ( email )
5100 Rockhill Road
Kansas City, MO 64110-2499
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,169
Downloads: 284
Download Rank: 51,263

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.453 seconds