Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1536805
 
 

Footnotes (178)



 


 



Yes, I Destroyed the Evidence – Sue Me? Intentional Spoliation of Evidence in Illinois


Michael A. Zuckerman


Jones Day

April 5, 2011

John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law, 2010

Abstract:     
This Article examines the availability of intentional spoliation as an independent cause of action under Illinois law. The topic is timely in light of the on-going debate and uncertainly surrounding spoliation of evidence law. Given the importance and timeliness of this topic, this Article is aimed not only at legal academics, but also at judges, legislators, and practitioners.

This Article is among the first to focus on intentional spoliation in Illinois. In short, it argues that the Illinois Supreme Court should recognize intentional spoliation as an independent tort. After providing background about spoliation generally, and the watershed case of Boyd v. Travelers Insurance Company, the Article details the policy interests at stake and sets forth a strong case for permitting a tort for intentional spoliation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 18, 2010 ; Last revised: September 6, 2013

Suggested Citation

Zuckerman, Michael A., Yes, I Destroyed the Evidence – Sue Me? Intentional Spoliation of Evidence in Illinois (April 5, 2011). John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1536805

Contact Information

Michael A. Zuckerman (Contact Author)
Jones Day ( email )
Chicago, IL 60610
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,403
Downloads: 799
Download Rank: 15,670
Footnotes:  178

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.359 seconds