Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1537609
 
 

Citations (6)



 


 



Strategies for Preventing False Confessions and Their Consequences


Deborah Davis


University of Nevada, Reno

Richard A. Leo


University of San Francisco - School of Law


PRACTICAL PSYCHOLOGY FOR FORENSIC INVESTIGATIONS AND PROSECUTIONS, Mark R. Kebbell and Graham M. Davies, eds., Wiley & Sons, 2006
Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2011-20

Abstract:     
Researchers have amply documented that contemporary methods of psychological interrogation can, and sometimes do, lead innocent individuals to confess falsely to serious crimes. The consequences of these false confessions can be disastrous for innocent individuals. This chapter reviews the primary causes of false confession and resultant miscarriages of justice that are subject to the influence of law enforcement and the courts. We first review the major identifiable causes of false confession, offering suggestions for ways to minimize or avoid them. We offer four primary strategies for prevention of false confessions: (i) interrogation only of those for whom there is sufficient probable cause to support guilt; (ii) educating law enforcement concerning the potential for and causes of false confessions; (iii) avoiding practices known to promote false confession; and (iv) greater training and sensitivity to the psychological vulnerabilities that render some suspects unusually susceptible to influence. Finally, we outline strategies for recognizing false confessions when they do occur, and thereby for minimizing their consequences.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: false confessions, wrongful convictions, interrogation methods, police, law enforcement

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 17, 2010 ; Last revised: August 2, 2011

Suggested Citation

Davis, Deborah and Leo, Richard A., Strategies for Preventing False Confessions and Their Consequences. PRACTICAL PSYCHOLOGY FOR FORENSIC INVESTIGATIONS AND PROSECUTIONS, Mark R. Kebbell and Graham M. Davies, eds., Wiley & Sons, 2006; Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2011-20. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1537609

Contact Information

Deborah Davis
University of Nevada, Reno ( email )
Reno, NV 89557
United States
Richard A. Leo (Contact Author)
University of San Francisco - School of Law ( email )
2130 Fulton Street
San Francisco, CA 94117
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,759
Downloads: 616
Download Rank: 23,233
Citations:  6

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.297 seconds