Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1538304
 


 



Review Essay: Golden Rule Ethics and the Death of the Criminal Law's Special Part


Stuart P. Green


Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - School of Law-Newark

January 18, 2010

Criminal Justice Ethics, Forthcoming
CRIME AND CULPABILITY: A THEORY OF CRIMINAL LAW, Larry Alexander, Kimberly Kessler Ferzan, Stephen Morse, eds., Cambridge University Press, 358 pp., 2009
Rutgers School of Law-Newark Research Papers No. 063

Abstract:     
This brief review of Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law, by Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan, with Stephen Morse, focuses on the authors’ proposal that the Special Part of the criminal law, the part that identifies and defines specific offenses, be radically stripped down in a manner that is reminiscent of the Golden Rule of Ethics, which, they say, offers a “clear” and “concise” guide to living ethically. Rather than a long list of specific prohibited forms of conduct (“don’t murder,” “don’t rape,” “don’t commit theft,” and the like), they argue, the criminal law should rely on a single “general rule,” to the effect that “[i]t is criminal for an actor to take an unjustified risk of causing harm to a legally protected interest or to take an unjustified risk that his conduct constitutes prohibited behavior.”

Contrary to the authors’ contention, the proper formulation, meaning, and function of Golden Rule of Ethics are anything but “clear.” There are substantial controversies about both the Rule's substance (its proper formulation, its meaning, and whether it leads to the right result), and its procedure (e.g. about whether the rule is meant to be relied on by ordinary people on a case-by-case basis in their daily lives; applied only when there exists no more specific rule on point, or where specific rules conflict; or used, primarily by theorists, as a general justifying principle that explains or justifies more specific ethical rules). Relying on a single, general rule of conduct in the criminal law sphere would create similar interpretive and practical uncertainties and difficulties. Rather than doing away with centuries of common law and legislative developments, and essentially starting over, we should instead endeavor to refine the criminal codes we already have so that they are more carefully formulated and more respectful of the harm principle.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: Golden Rule, Criminal Law Special Part

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 25, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Green, Stuart P., Review Essay: Golden Rule Ethics and the Death of the Criminal Law's Special Part (January 18, 2010). CRIME AND CULPABILITY: A THEORY OF CRIMINAL LAW, Larry Alexander, Kimberly Kessler Ferzan, Stephen Morse, eds., Cambridge University Press, 358 pp., 2009 ; Rutgers School of Law-Newark Research Papers No. 063. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1538304

Contact Information

Stuart P. Green (Contact Author)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - School of Law-Newark ( email )
123 Washington Street
Newark, NJ 07102
United States
973-353-3006 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 964
Downloads: 103
Download Rank: 159,522

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.343 seconds