|
||||
|
||||
A Pot of Gold at the End of the Rainbow: An Economic Incentives-Based Approach to OSHA WhistleblowingJarod Spencer GonzalezTexas Tech University School of Law January 18, 2010 The Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, Forthcoming Texas Tech Law School Research Paper No. 2010-11 Abstract: Labor and employment law whistleblower statutes focus on protecting employees who complain about workplace violations by prohibiting the employer from taking an adverse employment action against the whistleblower because of his or her complaint. It is an open question whether even the strongest of anti-retaliation protections in whistleblower statutes do much to encourage employees to report wrongdoing. If more of the right kind of whistleblowing is beneficial from a policy perspective, it is important to consider other models for encouraging potential whistleblowers to act. In the workplace safety and health area, OSHA-enforced whistleblower statutes follow the traditional anti-retaliation model and have generally failed to motivate the right type of whistleblowing and protect those who do make complaints. This piece outlines an "economic rewards" approach to OSHA whistleblowing in which an employee who complains to the Department of Labor about a federal workplace safety and health violation could ultimately receive a monetary reward for the tip if the Department subsequently determines that a workplace safety and health violation occurred. While this type of approach is a novel one in the workplace safety and health area, it has worked well in the context of fraud against the government. Transporting this model to workplace safety and health has some appeal even though there are a variety of technical issues that would have to be considered for such an approach to be realistic.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24 Keywords: whistleblower, OSHA, workplace safety and health, economic rewards model, bounty model JEL Classification: J28, J78, K32 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 20, 2010 ; Last revised: May 11, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.344 seconds