Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1538571
 
 

Footnotes (174)



 


 



Extreme Measures: Does the United States Need Preventive Detention to Combat Domestic Terrorism?


Diane Webber


affiliation not provided to SSRN

January 18, 2010

Touro International Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 128, 2010

Abstract:     
The paper deals with preventive detention in the United States, i.e. the detaining of a suspect to prevent a future domestic terrorist offense. Two recent events are examined: the Fort Hood shootings; and a preventive arrest in France, to consider problems in combating terrorist crimes on U.S. soil. The paper demonstrates that U.S. law as it now stands, with some limited exceptions, does not permit detention to forestall an anticipated domestic terrorist crime. After reviewing and evaluating the way in which France, Israel and the United Kingdom use forms of preventive detention to thwart possible terrorist acts, the paper proposes three possible ways to fill this gap in U.S. law, and give the United States the same tools to fight terrorism as the other countries discussed in the paper, within the boundaries of the Constitution.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: Preventive detention, prevention of future terrorist acts, French, Israeli and British law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 19, 2010 ; Last revised: March 28, 2011

Suggested Citation

Webber, Diane, Extreme Measures: Does the United States Need Preventive Detention to Combat Domestic Terrorism? (January 18, 2010). Touro International Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 128, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1538571

Contact Information

Diane Webber (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 525
Downloads: 104
Download Rank: 147,135
Footnotes:  174

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.563 seconds