Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1539123
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (329)



 


 



Enabling Employee Choice: A Structural Approach to the Rules of Union Organizing


Benjamin I. Sachs


Harvard Law School

January 19, 2010

Harvard Law Review, Vol. 123, No. 3, p. 655, 2010

Abstract:     
The proposed Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) has led to fierce debate over how best to ensure employees a choice on the question of unionization. The debate goes to the core of our federal system of labor law. Each of the potential legislative designs under consideration - including both “card check” and “rapid elections” - aims to enhance employee choice by minimizing or eliminating managerial involvement in the unionization process. The central question raised by EFCA, therefore, is whether enabling employees to limit or avoid managerial intervention in union campaigns is an appropriate goal for federal law. This Article answers this foundational question in the affirmative. It reaches this conclusion by conceptualizing federal labor law in terms of legal default rules, drawing in particular on the preference-eliciting default theory of statutory interpretation and the reversible default theory from corporate law. Doing so leads to the argument that card check, rapid elections, and similar mechanisms are best understood as “asymmetry-correcting altering rules” - means of mitigating the impediments that block departure from the nonunion default. Understanding EFCA in this way also requires that we ask how such an altering rule should be constructed. This Article addresses this institutional design question by arguing that card check’s open decision-making process is flawed and that rapid elections, while an improvement over the status quo, are an insufficient method of mitigating the relevant impediments to employee choice. Accordingly, this Article offers two new designs - alternatives to both card check and rapid elections - that would accomplish the legitimate function of minimizing managerial intervention while at the same time preserving secrecy in decision-making.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 74

Keywords: Labor Law, Unions, Union Organizing, Default Rules, Altering Rules

JEL Classification: J5, K31

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 21, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Sachs, Benjamin I., Enabling Employee Choice: A Structural Approach to the Rules of Union Organizing (January 19, 2010). Harvard Law Review, Vol. 123, No. 3, p. 655, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1539123

Contact Information

Benjamin I. Sachs (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 971
Downloads: 183
Download Rank: 97,019
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  329

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.328 seconds