Abstract

 
 

References (16)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Decision Usefulness and Accelerated Filing Deadlines


Jeffrey T. Doyle


Utah State University

Matthew J. Magilke


Claremont McKenna College

June 1, 2013

Journal of Accounting Research, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
In this study, we examine the impact of the SEC’s decision to accelerate the filing of 10-Ks. The SEC argued that the accelerated deadline would increase the relevance of the disclosures, making the reports more useful. Opponents countered that the accelerated deadline would decrease the representational faithfulness of the disclosures, especially for smaller firms. We document a significant decrease in the 10-K market reaction for smaller firms as they accelerate from 90 to 75 days. For larger firms we find no significant change in the market reaction from 90 to 75 days. However, as these larger firms accelerate their 10-K deadline to 60 days, we find a significant increase in the market reaction. We also examine changes in reporting quality, shifts in information content, and changes in 10-K filing order and clustering and find results that are consistent with accelerated filing having significant impacts on representational faithfulness and relevance.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: 10-K, SEC Disclosures, SOX, Disclosure Timing

JEL Classification: M41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 21, 2010 ; Last revised: December 8, 2012

Suggested Citation

Doyle, Jeffrey T. and Magilke, Matthew J., Decision Usefulness and Accelerated Filing Deadlines (June 1, 2013). Journal of Accounting Research, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1539625 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1539625

Contact Information

Jeffrey T. Doyle (Contact Author)
Utah State University ( email )
College of Business
Logan, UT 84322-3540
United States
Matthew J. Magilke
Claremont McKenna College ( email )
500 E 9th St
Claremont, CA 91711
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 532
Downloads: 149
Download Rank: 98,568
References:  16
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.438 seconds