|
||||
|
||||
Reflections on Section 5 of the FTC Act and the FTC’s Case against IntelDaniel A. CraneUniversity of Michigan Law School January 19, 2010 Antitrust Chronicle, Forthcoming U of Michigan Law & Econ, Empirical Legal Studies Center Paper No. 10-001 U of Michigan Public Law Working Paper No. 181 Abstract: This paper explores the policy implications of the FTC's decision to file its enforcement action against Intel under Section 5 of the FTC Act and declare that it has the power to go further under Section 5's "unfair competition" prong than it could under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. It argues that Intel is an inappropriate case for the Commission to make a bid for Section 5 independence since none of the Commission's institutional advantages over Article III courts justifies a departure from ordinary Section 2 norms in this case. Indeed, the Intel case has the potential to set back the Commission's enforcement powers by prompting a reviewing court to chastise the Commission for overreaching and rejecting a broad view of Section 5.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26 Keywords: Intel, FTC Act, Sherman Act JEL Classification: K21 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 22, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.375 seconds