University of Hawaii at Manoa - William S. Richardson School of Law
October 1, 2009
Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vol. 10, 2009
The climate crisis introduces an existential and moral dilemma of unparalleled proportions. The proliferation of carbon-based emissions in the atmosphere is threatening – and will continue to threaten with greater severity – the ecosystems that support all life and human civilisation. The impacts of climate change are experienced unevenly, with the most vulnerable – the ‘climate vulnerable’ – set to suffer first and worst.1 The current and anticipated impacts demonstrate a grand irony: those who will suffer most acutely are also those who are least responsible for the crisis to date. That irony introduces a great ethical dilemma, one that our systems of law and governance are ill-equipped to accommodate. Indeed, attempts to right this imbalance between fault and consequence have resulted in a cacophony of political negotiation and legal action between and amongst various political scales that have yielded insufficient remedies, if any. In this article, I introduce a theory of climate reparations to meet the great and disproportionate injuries that will result from anthropogenic climate change.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 22, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds