Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1540344
 
 

Footnotes (20)



 


 



A., B. & C. v. Ireland: 'Europe's Roe v. Wade'?


Shannon K. Calt


Lewis & Clark Law Review

June 24, 2010

Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, p, 1189, 2010

Abstract:     
In Ireland, abortion is illegal. In 2005, three Irish women who had previously traveled to England for abortions brought suit in the European Court of Human Rights asserting that restrictive and unclear Irish laws violate several provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights. The case was heard before the Grand Chamber of the Court on 12/09/2009 and a decision is forthcoming some time in 2010, perhaps 2011.

The European Court of Human Rights has never determined whether the Convention protects a right to life of the unborn or conversely any right to an abortion.The case at hand squarely presents an opportunity for the Court to take a position.

This Note focuses on Irish and European Court of Human Rights abortion law and the impending decision in A., B. & C. v. Ireland. I conclude that - based upon the Court's own jurisprudence - the European Court of Human Rights is very likely to declare that Ireland's nearly absolute abortion ban and the resultant effects of Irish law did and continue to violate rights the Court has already deemed protected by the European Convention on Human Rights. The Court will likely embrace one of two possible holdings. First, the Court could find that Ireland's abortion ban causes undesirable secondary effects such as inadequate post-abortion care, that these effects implicate rights under the Convention, and that Ireland has an unfulfilled positive obligation to mitigate these effects. Alternatively, I suggest that the Court may hold that Ireland's abortion ban itself violates the personal and family rights of applicants A., B. and C. and women like them. Commentators have referred to this case as “Europe's Roe v. Wade,” and I believe this to be an accurate if oversimplified statement.

This Note is published in issue 14.3 of the Lewis & Clark Law Review.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: Ireland, Abortion, European, Court, Human, Rights, Roe, Wade, 'A., B. & C.', comparative, Convention, Planned, Parenthood, Casey

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 24, 2010 ; Last revised: September 17, 2010

Suggested Citation

Calt, Shannon K., A., B. & C. v. Ireland: 'Europe's Roe v. Wade'? (June 24, 2010). Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, p, 1189, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1540344

Contact Information

Shannon Calt (Contact Author)
Lewis & Clark Law Review ( email )
0615 SW Palatine Hill Road
Portland, OR 97204
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,472
Downloads: 549
Download Rank: 26,460
Footnotes:  20

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.328 seconds