Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1540686
 


 



Reconceiving the Fourth Amendment and the Exclusionary Rule


Craig Bradley


Indiana University Maurer School of Law

2010

Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 73, p. 211, 2010
Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 143

Abstract:     
In Herring v. United States, the Supreme Court indicated both that it was undertaking a major revision, essentially an abolition, of the exclusionary rule and at other times, including in it's stated holding, suggested that it was only reducing the rule's force in a minor way. This article reconceives the exclusionary rule in light of the reasonableness language of the Fourth Amendment. It argues that the best approach to exclusion, unlike the Court's past approach, or it's proposal in Herring, is to exclude evidence only when there is a violation of the Court's Fourth Amendment rules and that violation is "unreasonable" or negligent on the part of police. This compromise would eliminate much of the conservative opposition to the rule while maintaining it as an effective deterrence to police misconduct.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: Criminal Procedure, Fourth Amendment, Exclusionary Rule

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 24, 2010 ; Last revised: July 3, 2013

Suggested Citation

Bradley, Craig, Reconceiving the Fourth Amendment and the Exclusionary Rule (2010). Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 73, p. 211, 2010; Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 143. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1540686

Contact Information

Craig Bradley (Contact Author)
Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )
211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 903
Downloads: 185
Download Rank: 97,293

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds