Barack Obama, Sir Walter Raleigh and Forensics (or the 2008 Election and the Future of the Right of Confrontation)
Widener University - School of Law
January 22, 2010
It's Evident, (National Clearinghouse for Science, Technology and the Law), January 2010
For the Court in Crawford v. Washington, the historic roots of the right of Confrontation were a rejection of such procedures, and a mandate that “testimonial” hearsay be inadmissible unless the original declarant was now in court or was now unavailable to testify and there had been the opportunity for cross-examination when the statement was made. The relevance of Crawford (and Raleigh’s travails) to forensics can be found in the 2009 Melendez-Diaz decision.
What does this, and Sir Walter Raleigh, have to do with Barack Obama?
Number of Pages in PDF File: 1
Keywords: evidence, hearsay, right of confrontation
JEL Classification: K4Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 25, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.422 seconds