Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1542262
 


 



The Polyphonic Courtroom: Expanding the Possibilities of Judicial Discourse


Robert Rubinson


University of Baltimore - School of Law

1996

Dickinson Law Review, Vol. 101, No. 1, p. 3, 1996

Abstract:     
This Article draws upon the ideas of Mikhail Bakhtin to critique judicial discourse as embodied in written opinions. Judicial opinions are typically monologues which reject exploration of complex issues of meaning in favor of simply justifying a result. Opinions should instead be part of a continuing dialogue whose hallmark is exploration, not simplification - what the Article characterizes as "polyphonic," Polyphonic opinions should embrace dialogue and complexity and recognize the validity of mutliple perspectives. This goal can not simply be willed, however, because cognition by necessity simplifies. To meet this challenges, the Article concludes with recommendations for "judicial calisthenics," including techniques drawn from social psychology, to promote polyphonic judicial decision-making.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 39

Keywords: bakhtin, judicial decision-making, polyphony, dialogic

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 25, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Rubinson, Robert, The Polyphonic Courtroom: Expanding the Possibilities of Judicial Discourse (1996). Dickinson Law Review, Vol. 101, No. 1, p. 3, 1996. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1542262

Contact Information

Robert Rubinson (Contact Author)
University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )
1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 206
Downloads: 22

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.437 seconds