Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1543517
 


 



A Cold Breeze in California: ProtectMarriage Reveals the Chilling Effect of Campaign Finance Disclosure on Ballot Measure Issue Advocacy


Stephen R. Klein


Wyoming Liberty Group

November 15, 2009

Engage: The Journal of the Federalist Society Practice Groups, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2009

Abstract:     
Although a state government may have an interest in disseminating donor information behind some campaigns for or against ballot measures, the Ninth Circuit’s interpretation of the “informational interest” from Buckley v. Valeo was not a concern in Proposition 8, which implicated a purely social issue. Thus, in light of the use of donor information to abridge free speech, this articulation of the informational interest does not survive strict scrutiny: as applied, California’s disclosure law indirectly infringes upon First Amendment rights by facilitating the suppression of political speech.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: First Amendment, free speech, ballot measure, campaign finance, disclosure, election law, proposition 8

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 28, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Klein, Stephen R., A Cold Breeze in California: ProtectMarriage Reveals the Chilling Effect of Campaign Finance Disclosure on Ballot Measure Issue Advocacy (November 15, 2009). Engage: The Journal of the Federalist Society Practice Groups, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1543517

Contact Information

Stephen Ralph Klein (Contact Author)
Wyoming Liberty Group ( email )
1902 Thomes Ave
Suite 201
Cheyenne, WY 82001
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 361
Downloads: 27

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.375 seconds