To Be or Not to Be? Citizens United and the Corporate Form
Reuven S. Avi-Yonah
University of Michigan Law School
February 1, 2010
U of Michigan Law & Econ, Empirical Legal Studies Center Paper No. 10-005
U of Michigan Public Law Working Paper No. 184
In Citizens United vs. FEC, the Supreme Court struck down a Federal ban on direct corporate expenditures on political campaigns. The decision has been widely criticized and praised as a matter of First Amendment law. But it is also interesting as another step in the evolution of our legal views of the corporation. The thesis of this Article is that by viewing Citizens United through the prism of theories about the corporate form, it is possible to understand why both the majority and the dissent departed from previous Supreme Court cases on the First Amendment rights of corporations, and to predict what arguments can be expected next.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 37
Keywords: First Amendment, Corporations
JEL Classification: K22, L22Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 2, 2010 ; Last revised: February 9, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.922 seconds