Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1546087
 
 

Footnotes (141)



 


 



To Be or Not to Be? Citizens United and the Corporate Form


Reuven S. Avi-Yonah


University of Michigan Law School

February 1, 2010

U of Michigan Law & Econ, Empirical Legal Studies Center Paper No. 10-005
U of Michigan Public Law Working Paper No. 184

Abstract:     
In Citizens United vs. FEC, the Supreme Court struck down a Federal ban on direct corporate expenditures on political campaigns. The decision has been widely criticized and praised as a matter of First Amendment law. But it is also interesting as another step in the evolution of our legal views of the corporation. The thesis of this Article is that by viewing Citizens United through the prism of theories about the corporate form, it is possible to understand why both the majority and the dissent departed from previous Supreme Court cases on the First Amendment rights of corporations, and to predict what arguments can be expected next.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: First Amendment, Corporations

JEL Classification: K22, L22

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 2, 2010 ; Last revised: February 9, 2010

Suggested Citation

Avi-Yonah, Reuven S., To Be or Not to Be? Citizens United and the Corporate Form (February 1, 2010). U of Michigan Law & Econ, Empirical Legal Studies Center Paper No. 10-005; U of Michigan Public Law Working Paper No. 184. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1546087

Contact Information

Reuven S. Avi-Yonah (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
734-647-4033 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,967
Downloads: 402
Download Rank: 40,468
Footnotes:  141

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.265 seconds