Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1547323
 
 

Footnotes (341)



 


 



Collateral Conflict: Employer Claims of RICO Extortion Against Union Comprehensive Campaigns


James J. Brudney


Fordham University School of Law

February 3, 2010

Southern California Law Review, Forthcoming
Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 120

Abstract:     
The article addresses an important yet largely overlooked issue of statutory meaning and labor relations policy: employers’ aggressive use of civil RICO actions to chill coordinated union efforts in the organizing and bargaining arenas.

Over the past 30 years, facing volatile economic conditions and complex corporate relationships, unions have mounted coordinated campaigns (aimed at consumers, public officials, lenders, the media, and the public) in order to help organize new workers and to renew collective bargaining relationships. These often high-profile campaigns have at times been quite successful. In response, employers since the late 1980s have invoked civil RICO’s broad language to claim that the campaigns constitute actionable extortion. When these employer claims survive a motion to dismiss, they carry the threat of treble damages, attorneys’ fees, and reputational harms associated with unions being labeled mobsters. Such threats are usually enough to force a settlement if a motion to dismiss is denied, and this often means the demise of the union’s organizing or bargaining efforts. Countless millions of dollars have been expended on lawsuits involving civil RICO and unions, and there is no sign the litigation will abate any time soon.

The article contends that as a matter of law most RICO extortion claims against union comprehensive campaigns should not survive a motion to dismiss. In making its argument, the article examines in unprecedented depth the remarkable conversation between the Court and Congress regarding RICO – how the Court in the 1980s consciously expanded the text’s meaning well beyond conduct Congress had meant to reach; how Congress’s serious reform efforts over a 15 year period met with no success; and how the Court since 2001 has proceeded to adopt restrictive interpretations of civil RICO in the face of the prolonged congressional failure to do so. Having discounted Congress’s inability to enact RICO reform, the Court has signaled a willingness to exercise its own constraints when interpreting the language and concepts of civil RICO. That willingness, along with previous Court decisions reconciling federal regulation with various forms of aggressive speech-related activity, helps to frame and guide an appropriate response to the extortion cause of action at issue.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 73

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 5, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Brudney, James J., Collateral Conflict: Employer Claims of RICO Extortion Against Union Comprehensive Campaigns (February 3, 2010). Southern California Law Review, Forthcoming; Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 120. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1547323

Contact Information

James Julius Brudney (Contact Author)
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
212-636-7387 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 593
Downloads: 97
Download Rank: 159,593
Footnotes:  341

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.282 seconds