Impact of the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement on the Australian Medicines Regulation and Prices
Thomas Alured Faunce
Australian Research Council; Australian National University
Australian National University - ANU College of Law
Australian National University - College of Medidine, Biology and the Environment
Journal of Generic Medicines, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 18-29, 2010
ANU College of Law Research Paper No. 10-12
The Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA) came into force on 1 January 2005. Prior to and subsequently to the AUSFTA being concluded, controversy surrounded the debate over its impact on Australia’s health policy, specifically on regulation of pharmaceutical patents and Australia’s cost-effectiveness system relating to prescription medicine prices known as the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). This article examines the expectations of both parties in the pharmaceutical sector concerning the AUSFTA, as well as how successfully they were achieved. It seeks to analyse important relevant outcomes for regulators, the public and pharmaceutical industry, as well as lessons about how trade negotiations relating to health and medicines policy should be approached in future. To investigate whether AUSFTA-related regulatory changes may lead to higher medicines prices in Australia we looked at recent PBS Public Summary Documents (PSDs) to discover examples of PBS-approved F1 (patented) drugs, over the period from July 2008 until June 2009, that failed to establish cost-effectiveness over F2 (generic) comparators (with mandated price cuts) and were thence cost-minimised. This period was chosen since the major price effects of the potentially AUSFTA-related National Health Amendment (Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme) Act 2007 (Cth) came into effect from August 2008.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 13
Keywords: trade agreements, medicines regulation, pharmaceutical, cost-effectiveness, generic medicines, innovation
JEL Classification: L65, O32, O31, O34, O38Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 9, 2010 ; Last revised: April 29, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.422 seconds