Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1548146
 
 

Footnotes (272)



 


 



We Don't Want to Hear It: Psychology, Literature and the Narrative Model of Judging


Kenworthey Bilz


University of Illinois College of Law

February 4, 2010

University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 2010, No. 2

Abstract:     
The “narrative” model of legal judging argues that legal decision makers both do and should render judgments by assembling sensible stories out of evidence (as opposed to using Bayesian-type, linear models). This model is usually understood to demand that before one may judge a situation, one must give the parties the opportunity to tell their story in a manner that invites, or at least allows, empathy from the judger. This Article refers to this as the "inclusionary approach" to the narrative model of judging. Using psychological research in emotions and perspective-taking and the more intuitive techniques of literary criticism, this Article challenges the inclusionary narrative approach, arguing that, in practice, the law gives equal weight to an "exclusionary approach." That is, in order to render sound, legitimate legal judgments, the law deliberately limits the sort of stories parties are allowed to tell – and does so on moral grounds, not, or at least not only, to improve the "accuracy" of the legal judgment. That is, as both a descriptive and normative matter, impoverished narratives can be better than enriched ones in leading decision makers to morally acceptable legal judgments.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 60

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 5, 2010 ; Last revised: September 27, 2010

Suggested Citation

Bilz, Kenworthey, We Don't Want to Hear It: Psychology, Literature and the Narrative Model of Judging (February 4, 2010). University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 2010, No. 2. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1548146

Contact Information

Kenworthey Bilz (Contact Author)
University of Illinois College of Law ( email )
504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,396
Downloads: 312
Download Rank: 54,244
Footnotes:  272

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.282 seconds