Footnotes (111)



A Woman's Worth

Kimberly D. Krawiec

Duke University School of Law

March 8, 2010

North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 88. p. 102, 2010

This Article examines three traditionally “taboo trades”: (1) the sale of sex, (2) compensated egg donation, and (3) commercial surrogacy. The article purposely invokes examples in which the compensated provision of goods or services (primarily or exclusively by women) is legal, but in which commodification is only partially achieved or is constrained in some way. I argue that incomplete commodification disadvantages female providers in these instances, by constraining their agency, earning power, and status. Moreover, anticommodification and coercion rhetoric is sometimes invoked in these settings by interest groups who, at best, have little interest in female empowerment and, at worst, have economic or political interests at odds with it.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: Sex Work, Virginity, Prostitution, Oocyte Donation, Sperm Markets, Surrogacy, Medical Marijuana

JEL Classification: K00, K14, K34, K42

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 6, 2010 ; Last revised: December 26, 2014

Suggested Citation

Krawiec, Kimberly D., A Woman's Worth (March 8, 2010). North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 88. p. 102, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1548929

Contact Information

Kimberly D. Krawiec (Contact Author)
Duke University School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,056
Downloads: 376
Download Rank: 51,616
Footnotes:  111
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. A Critique on Surrogacy Contracts
By G. V. Nath

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 1.281 seconds