Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1549166
 
 

Footnotes (183)



 


 



A Pragmatic Approach to Judicial Review of Informal Guidance Documents


Mark M. Bell


Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP

February 8, 2010


Abstract:     
The Supreme Court has increasingly allowed agencies to act by informal means. This change has caused intense confusion (1) respecting how these guidance documents fit within the administrative regime and (2) respecting the proper level of deference these informal documents should receive. This article details the Supreme Court’s current Chevron-deference jurisprudence and examines the Court’s treatment of informal guidance documents in several recent decisions.

This Article argues that the Court should abandon its current approach to guidance documents and analyze and defer to administrative action pragmatically. Under this pragmatic approach, the reviewing court should analyze the character of the agency action; that is to say, the court should determine whether the agency is initiating, modifying, or reversing policy. The character of the agency action should then dictate the types of procedures the agency can employ. The reviewing court can then ensure that the agency used the proper procedures depending on the character of the agency action. The level of deference will then formulaically flow from the type of procedure used.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: Chevron, Deference, Administrative, Administrative Law, Admin, Admin Law, Skidmore, Ossification, Mead, Informal, Agency, Action, Agency Action, Guidance Documents, Rulemaking

JEL Classification: K2, K20, K23

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 7, 2010 ; Last revised: February 10, 2010

Suggested Citation

Bell, Mark M., A Pragmatic Approach to Judicial Review of Informal Guidance Documents (February 8, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1549166 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1549166

Contact Information

Mark M. Bell (Contact Author)
Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP ( email )
511 Union Street, Suite 2700
Nashville, TN 37219
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 280
Downloads: 56
Download Rank: 223,918
Footnotes:  183

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.313 seconds