Reaching Out to Do Justice: The Rise and Fall of the Special Docket of the U.S. Supreme Court
Gabriel J. Chin
University of California, Davis - School of Law
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law
June 10, 2011
Houston Law Review, Vol. 28, p. 197, 2011
Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No 10-04
In 1964-1967, the Supreme Court put three complicated cases involving individuals in a permanent state of suspension on what would come to be known as the “Special Docket.” Under this largely unknown feature of the Court’s practice, the cases were held without decision until after the parties involved died in the 1990s. Although the impulse to mercy in these cases was understandable (all involved mental illness and two were capital cases), as a small experiment, it must be adjudged a failure, because there is a reasonable possibility that in each case, just outcomes were not achieved. Assuming that the Court thought judicial intervention was necessary to avoid an unjust outcome, using the normal tools of decision might have been better.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 69
Keywords: Supreme Court, Special Docket, Death Penalty, Warren Burger
JEL Classification: K14, K4, K41, K42Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 8, 2010 ; Last revised: June 17, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.480 seconds