Footnotes (39)



The Unpublished Free Exercise Opinion in Jensen v. Quaring

Paul E. McGreal

University of Dayton School of Law

Fall 2009

Southern Illinois University Law Journal

Since they were opened to the public in March 2004, the Harry A. Blackmun Papers at the Library of Congress have provided a wealth of information about the United States Supreme Court and its landmark decisions. This Essay leaves the beaten path, focusing on an unpublished Opinion of the Court in the relatively unknown case Jensen v. Quaring. In the official United States Reports, Jensen is a summary disposition - the Court split four to four and so affirmed the lower court without opinion. The Blackmun Papers, however, show that the vote after oral argument was five to three to reverse the court of appeals. After Chief Justice Burger circulated a draft Opinion of the Court that would have radically altered the Court’s approach to the Free Exercise Clause, Justice Blackmun switched his vote, making the tally four to four. So, while Jensen could have been a turning point in the Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence, it instead resides in constitutional law obscurity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: Religion and the Law, Constitutional Law, Free Exercise, Harry Blackmun, Supreme Court

Download This Paper

Date posted: February 9, 2010  

Suggested Citation

McGreal, Paul E., The Unpublished Free Exercise Opinion in Jensen v. Quaring (Fall 2009). Southern Illinois University Law Journal. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1549798

Contact Information

Paul E. McGreal (Contact Author)
University of Dayton School of Law ( email )
300 College Park
Dayton, OH 45469
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 939
Downloads: 86
Download Rank: 186,072
Footnotes:  39

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.422 seconds