Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1549846
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (87)



 


 



Biodiversity and Climate Change Laws: A Failure to Communicate?


David Hodas


Widener University - School of Law

June 12, 2008

BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION, LAW & LIVELIHOODS: BRIDGING THE NORTH-SOUTH DIVIDE, Cambridge University Press, 2008

Abstract:     
Climate change driven by global warming is substantially modifying important ecosystems and threatens to destroy great swaths of biodiversity. At both the international and state levels, two separate sets of laws exist – one addresses biodiversity and endangered species (e.g., the United Nations Convention on Biodiversity, and the U.S. Endangered Species Act and comparable laws in other countries) and the other addresses greenhouse gas emissions. Each body of law poses the same (but mirrored) analytic question. That is, to what extent do the domestic and international laws of biodiversity consider climate change in their regulatory frameworks? And, conversely, to what extent do the emerging international and domestic climate change legal regimes account for biodiversity in their regulatory schemes? Are the regimes compatible, or do they operate at cross-purposes? Is the extent of incorporation adequate and effective? If not, how could the laws be improved to incorporate biodiversity concerns into climate change decisions, and to fold climate change concerns into the operation of biodiversity laws.

For instance, will greenhouse gas offset projects and emission trading regimes promote monoculture reforestation at the expense of biodiversity, or will biodiversity protection and enhancement be encouraged in evaluating projects? Conversely, the effects of warming are already being felt by a variety of ecosystems from coral reefs to Arctic sea ice; does this trigger legal obligations under biodiversity laws, and if so, what kind of remedies might be available under those laws? This paper argues the climate change legal regime and biodiversity legal regime operate on separate paths that fail to link biodiversity and climate change policy into decision making. As a result, there is a significant risk that climate change policy will be inconsistent with biodiversity goals and that biodiversity policy could interfere with climate change policy goals.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: biodiversity, climate change, environmental law, international law

JEL Classification: K32, Q20, Q23, Q42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 15, 2010 ; Last revised: July 27, 2010

Suggested Citation

Hodas, David, Biodiversity and Climate Change Laws: A Failure to Communicate? (June 12, 2008). BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION, LAW & LIVELIHOODS: BRIDGING THE NORTH-SOUTH DIVIDE, Cambridge University Press, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1549846

Contact Information

David Hodas (Contact Author)
Widener University - School of Law ( email )
4601 Concord Pike
P.O. Box 7286
Wilmington, DE 19803-0474
United States
302 477 2186 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,554
Downloads: 743
Download Rank: 17,476
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  87
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Climate Change and Human Rights: Unpacking the Issues
By Daniel Bodansky

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.250 seconds