David H. Kaye
The Pennsylvania State University Dickinson School of Law
January 13, 2010
Michigan Law Review First Impressions, Vol. 108, No. 51, 2010
Penn State Legal Studies Research Paper No. 20-2010
In August 2009, the Board of Trustees of the University of Akron added to the university's employment policy the following proviso: "any applicant may be asked to submit fingerprints or DNA sample for purpose of a federal criminal background check." Although the federal government does not do background checks with DNA, the policy is significant because it highlights a largely unexplored feature of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA). GINA generally prohibits employers from asking for "genetic information." The faculty senate and outside commentators have declared that the Akron policy is "of doubtful legality" because it "appears to violate" GINA. However, GINA's ban on the acquisition of "genetic information" also can be read so that it does not reach nonmedical DNA tests. Because employers have nondiscriminatory reasons to use forensic DNA identification technology, this narrower interpretation is more faithful to the express purpose of the law.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 8
Keywords: GINA, employment discrimination, genetic discrimination, forensic identification, employer, DNA, genetic testingAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 15, 2010 ; Last revised: February 19, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.343 seconds