Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1552462
 
 

Footnotes (145)



 


 



Group Consensus, Individual Consent


Elizabeth Chamblee Burch


University of Georgia Law School

March 8, 2011

George Washington Law Review, Vol. 79, p. 506, 2011
FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 430

Abstract:     
Despite a rise in the number of personal-injury and product-liability cases consolidated through multi-district litigation, a decline in class-certification motions, and several newsworthy nonclass settlements such as the $4.85 billion Vioxx settlement and estimated $700 million Zyprexa settlements, little ink has been spilled on nonclass aggregation’s unique issues. Sections 3.17 and 3.18 of the American Law Institute’s Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation are a noteworthy exception. This Article uses those principles as a lens for exploring thematic questions about the value of pluralism, group cohesion, governance, procedural justice, and legitimacy in nonclass aggregation.

Sections 3.17 and 3.18 make some scholars nervous because they substitute individual consent to a settlement for individual consent to a process. But the process itself plays a vital function; when process is coercive or consent is tainted those flaws undermine systemic legitimacy and can affect subsequent compliance with the outcome. To be sure, process should enable the enforcement of substantive laws. Yet, we can't achieve justice solely through maximizing welfare or ensuring that plaintiffs have free choice. Rather, process can enable plaintiffs to reason together about the right thing to do and give rise to moral obligations that help balance the uneasy union between the collective and the individual.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: Nonclass Aggregation, Consent, Autonomy, Multidistrict Litigation, Mass Torts, Procedural Justice, Aggregate Settlements, Moral Philosophy

JEL Classification: K10, K13, K40

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 14, 2010 ; Last revised: March 8, 2011

Suggested Citation

Burch, Elizabeth Chamblee, Group Consensus, Individual Consent (March 8, 2011). George Washington Law Review, Vol. 79, p. 506, 2011; FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 430. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1552462

Contact Information

Elizabeth Chamblee Burch (Contact Author)
University of Georgia Law School ( email )
225 Herty Drive
Athens, GA 30602
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,000
Downloads: 110
Download Rank: 152,145
Footnotes:  145

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.234 seconds