|
||||
|
||||
Is the Volatility of the Market Price of Risk Due to Intermittent Portfolio Re-Balancing?YiLi ChienFederal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Harold L. ColeUniversity of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Hanno N. LustigUCLA - Anderson School of Management; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) April 23, 2010 American Economic Review, Forthcoming Abstract: Our paper examines whether the well-documented failure of unsophisticated investors to rebalance their portfolios can help to explain the enormous counter-cyclical volatility of aggregate risk compensation in financial markets. To answer this question, we set up a model in which CRRA-utility investors have heterogeneous trading technologies. In our model, a large mass of investors do not re-balance their portfolio shares in response to aggregate shocks, while a smaller mass of active investors adjust their portfolio each period to respond to changes in the investment opportunity set. We find that these intermittent re-balancers amplify the effect of aggregate shocks on the time variation in risk premia by a factor of three by forcing active traders to sell more shares in good times and buy more shares in bad times.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 66 Keywords: Portfolio Rebalancing JEL Classification: G12 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: February 18, 2010 ; Last revised: August 24, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.344 seconds