Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1555343
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (292)



 


 



Uncertainty


Daniel A. Farber


University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

February 18, 2010

Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 99, p. 901, 2011
UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 1555343

Abstract:     
Many of the pressing policy issues facing us today require confronting the unknown and making difficult choices in the face of limited information. Economists distinguish between “uncertainty” (where the likelihood of the peril is non-quantifiable) and “risk” (where the likelihood is quantifiable). Uncertainty is particularly pernicious in situations where catastrophic outcomes are possible, but conventional decision tools are not equipped to cope with these potentially disastrous results. This Article describes new analytic tools for assessing potential catastrophic outcomes and applies them to some key policy issues: controlling greenhouse gases, adapting to unavoidable climate change, regulating nanotechnology, dealing with long-lived nuclear wastes, and controlling financial instability.

More specifically, economic modeling and policy analysis are often based on the assumption that extreme harms are highly unlikely, in the technical sense that the “tail” of the probability distributions is “thin” – in other words, that it approaches rapidly to zero. Thin tails allow extreme risks to be given relatively little weight. A growing body of research, however, focuses on the possibility of fat tails, which are common in systems with feedback between different components. As it turns out, fat tails and uncertainty often go together. Economic theories of “ambiguity” deal at a more general level with situations where multiple plausible models of reality confront a decision maker. Ambiguity theories are useful in considering systems with fat tails and in other situations where the probabilities are simply difficult to quantify. The Article considers both the policy implications of fat tails and the use of ambiguity theories such as α-maxmin.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 59

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 20, 2010 ; Last revised: April 16, 2011

Suggested Citation

Farber, Daniel A., Uncertainty (February 18, 2010). Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 99, p. 901, 2011; UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 1555343. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1555343 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1555343

Contact Information

Daniel A. Farber (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
Boalt Hall
Room 894
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
510-642-0340 (Phone)
510-642-3728 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,104
Downloads: 879
Download Rank: 14,084
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  292
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Environmental Disasters: An Introduction
By Daniel Farber

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds