Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1555708
 


 



Contingent Valuation Studies and Health Policy


Matthew D. Adler


Duke University - School of Law

February, 19 2010

Health Economics, Policy & Law, Vol. 5, p. 123, 2010
U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 10-10

Abstract:     
This short comment argues that both cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) should be seen as imperfect tools for evaluating health policy. This is true, not only for extra-welfarists, but even for welfarists, since both CBA and CEA can deviate from the use of social welfare functions (SWF). A simple model is provided to illustrate the divergence between CBA, CEA, and the SWF approach. With this insight in mind, the comment considers the appropriate role of contingent-valuation studies.

Keywords: Cost-benefit analysis, CBA, cost-effectiveness analysis, CEA, willingness to pay, willingness to accept, extrawelfarism, welfarism, Kaldor-Hicks principle, social welfare functions, health policy choice, welfare theory

JEL Classification: I18, K32

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: February 20, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Adler, Matthew D., Contingent Valuation Studies and Health Policy (February, 19 2010). Health Economics, Policy & Law, Vol. 5, p. 123, 2010; U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 10-10. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1555708

Contact Information

Matthew D. Adler (Contact Author)
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 552

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.234 seconds