The Hidden Dichotomy in the Law of Morality
affiliation not provided to SSRN
May 18, 2009
Campbell Law Review, Vol 31, p. 591, 2009
A careful reading of American jurisprudence reveals that hidden within the states’ so-called interest in protecting morality, there is a dichotomy between the unconstitutional imposition of religious morality and the proper and necessary protection of the civil morality. Rather than annihilating the states’ right to enforce laws on the basis of any form of morality, Justice Kennedy’s opinion in Lawrence v. Texas carefully excised and prohibited statutes based merely on religious morality, while leaving the states’ ability to enforce laws based on civil morality untouched.
This Comment begins by exploring the dichotomy itself, and then carefully distinguishing civil and religious morality. The analysis then examines Lawrence v. Texas and clarifies how the opinion affected the dichotomy. Next, this Comment applies the post-Lawrence understanding of the rational basis test to several issues of concern raised by opponents of the decision. Finally, this Comment speculates as to the possible implications of Lawrence for moral issues lying
on the horizon.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22
Keywords: Same-Sex Marriage, Bestiality, Same-Sex Adoption, Gay Marriage, Polygamy, Abortion, Lawrence, Lawrence v. Texas, Scalia, PrivacyAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: June 2, 2010
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds