Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1557894
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Caperton: Correct Today, Compelling Tomorrow


James J. Sample


Hofstra University, Maurice A. Deane School of Law

February 23, 2010

Syracuse Law Review, Vol. 60, p. 293, 2010
Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-07

Abstract:     
This symposium article asserts that Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. is correct in result; correct in its narrowness; and correct in calling on courts to be more rigorous in recusal than due process requires. The article argues that Caperton is a model of judicial restraint and that, paradoxically for a decision overturning a state justice's non-recusal, the majority's approach is a model of cooperative federalism. These characteristics are particularly exemplified by the degree to which the opinion tracks the counsel offered by the Conference of Chief Justices, both as to what the opinion decides, and as to what it does not decide. Second, the article asserts that the breadth of support for the petitioners in Caperton, combined with state-level developments in the decision's aftermath, support the proposition that the decision's greatest impact will be not as dispositive precedent in itself, but in spurring greater vigilance in recusal, both systemically and among individual jurists.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 24, 2010 ; Last revised: March 29, 2010

Suggested Citation

Sample, James J., Caperton: Correct Today, Compelling Tomorrow (February 23, 2010). Syracuse Law Review, Vol. 60, p. 293, 2010; Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-07. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1557894

Contact Information

James J. Sample (Contact Author)
Hofstra University, Maurice A. Deane School of Law ( email )
121 Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY 11549
United States
516-463-7236 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.hofstra.edu/directory/faculty/fulltimefaculty/ftfac_sample.html
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 938
Downloads: 105
Download Rank: 157,402
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.281 seconds