When Selling Your Personal Name Mark Extends to Selling Your Soul

Yvette Joy Liebesman

Saint Louis University - School of Law

February 24, 2010

Temple Law Review, Vol. 83, No. 1, Fall 2010

Identifying one’s business with one’s personal name has long been a practice in the United States. As Personal Name Marks have become increasingly commodified, however, bargaining and deal-making has led more and more to transfers of rights which had previously been considered to be closely tied to the individual as a private person. This article posits that freedom of contract doctrine should not allow the complete alienation of all aspects of one’s name, but rather there should be limitations on how far parties may bargain, so that the purchaser cannot acquire the right to control the seller’s private activities. This article concludes that, in light of constitutional prohibitions, public policy grounds, administrative convenience and other considerations, when selling rights to one’s Personal Name Mark, the most reasonable balance requires placing some limits on the extent to which one may bargain away the personal freedoms associated with one’s name.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Keywords: Trademarks, Contract

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 24, 2010 ; Last revised: February 5, 2012

Suggested Citation

Liebesman, Yvette Joy, When Selling Your Personal Name Mark Extends to Selling Your Soul (February 24, 2010). Temple Law Review, Vol. 83, No. 1, Fall 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1558480

Contact Information

Yvette Joy Liebesman (Contact Author)
Saint Louis University - School of Law ( email )
100 N. Tucker Blvd.
St. Louis, MO 63101
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 486
Downloads: 17
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds