Caesar's Faith: Limited Government and Freedom of Religion in Bruker v. Marcovitz
Frederick C. DeCoste
University of Alberta - Faculty of Law
February 25, 2010
Dalhousie Law Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 153-176, 2009
The Supreme Court of Canada has long pursued the view that our law is somehow an expression and repository of what it terms "Canada's fundatmental values." In Bruker v. Marcovitz -- a case that concerned the enforceability of a promise by a divorcing Jewish husband to provide his wife Get, a religious divorce -- the Court added to the catalogue of these judicially decreed and enforced values one concerning religion, namely, the protection of Canadians against the arbitary disadvanagtes of their religions. This comment argues that the Court's judgment in this regard constitutes a fundamental threat to religious liberty inasmuch as it subordinates religious belief and practice to state values by making the legal acceptability of the former turn on their conformity to the latter.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 26, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.406 seconds