Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1559471
 
 

Footnotes (112)



 


 



Free Exercise of Religion: A Pragmatic and Comparative Assessment


Mark Kende


Drake University Law School

February 25, 2010

University of South Dakota Law Review, Forthcoming
Drake University Law School Research Paper No. 11-30

Abstract:     
This short article analyzes the leading free exercise of religion cases from the U.S., South Africa, and Canada. It reveals that the most well reasoned case (from Canada) take an approach that can be called “constitutional pragmatism.” This approach focuses on the factual details of the case, the social and historical context, and the likely consequences. It is also transparent in its justifications and openly balances the various competing factors on both sides of the case. Moreover, the weaker cases utilize more formalistic and abstract reasoning, tend to be overbroad , and therefore produce decisions that create doctrinal tensions with previous precedents. This comparative analysis can provide valuable lessons for religious liberty jurisprudence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 2, 2010 ; Last revised: November 15, 2011

Suggested Citation

Kende, Mark, Free Exercise of Religion: A Pragmatic and Comparative Assessment (February 25, 2010). University of South Dakota Law Review, Forthcoming; Drake University Law School Research Paper No. 11-30. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1559471

Contact Information

Mark Kende (Contact Author)
Drake University Law School ( email )
27th & Carpenter Sts.
Des Moines, IA 50311
United States
515-271-3354 (Phone)
515-271-1858 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.drake.edu/centers/conLaw
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 748
Downloads: 99
Download Rank: 156,384
Footnotes:  112

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.234 seconds