|
||||
|
||||
How Do Electoral Systems Affect Fiscal Policy? Evidence from State and Local Governments, 1890 to 2005Patricia FunkUniversitat Pompeu Fabra Christina GathmannAlfred-Weber Institut; Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA); CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research); University of Mannheim February 2010 CESifo Working Paper Series No. 2958 Abstract: Using a new data set on Swiss state and local governments from 1890 to today, we analyze how the adoption of proportional representation affects fiscal policy. We show that proportional systems shift spending toward broad goods (e.g. education and welfare benefits) but decrease spending on targetable goods (e.g. roads and agricultural subsidies). Our evidence does not suggest that proportional representation increases the overall size of government. We provide new evidence on the mechanism behind these estimates. We show that proportional elections lead to better political representation of left-wing parties, which are associated with more spending. Furthermore, proportional elections lead to higher political fragmentation. However, since political fragmentation increases spending in a plurality system only, proportional elections reduce spending through its more moderate effects of fractionalized parliaments.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 50 Keywords: electoral system, public finance, political fragmentation, matching JEL Classification: H00, H10, H40, H52, H53, H72, N83, N84 working papers seriesDate posted: February 28, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.438 seconds