Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1559886
 
 

Footnotes (60)



 


 



Zappers - Retail VAT Fraud


Richard Thompson Ainsworth


Boston University - School of Law; NYU - Graduate Tax Program

February 26, 2010

Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 10-04

Abstract:     
Zappers skim cash sales at retail. Zappers are add-on programs used by merchants with electronic cash registers (ECRs) or point-of-sale (POS) systems. Zappers are smart and selective. They do not skim all sales, and they never skim credit card transactions.

Although they are present in every jurisdiction, Zappers appear to be most widely used in developed economies that combine high levels of cash sales with high rates of consumption tax. Sweden, for example, has a cash-intensive economy, one of the world’s highest VAT rates (25%), and also reports that 70% of the ECRs in the country are either “… constructed for manipulation or have had software installed that allow sales to be manipulated (Zappers)…”

Tax losses in the EU can be estimated at approximately $23 billion per year in the restaurant sector alone. Germany tops the list followed by the UK, France, Italy and then Spain.

 
Country Revenue Loss (in millions) Country Revenue Loss (in millions)
Austria 508.7 Latvia 58.4
Belgium 600.5 Lithuania 100.1
Bulgaria 45.9 Luxembourg 79.2
Cyprus 33.4 Malta 16.7
Czech Republic 404.5 Netherlands 1,042.5
Denmark 316.9 Poland 1,030.0
Estonia 41.7 Portugal 362.8
Finland 296.0 Romania 417.0
France [3] 3,294.3 Slovakia 183.5
Germany [1] 4,503.6 Slovenia 87.6
Greece 529.6 Spain [5] 2,160.1
Hungary 304.4 Sweden 529.6
Ireland 291.9 United Kingdom [2] 3,448.6
Italy [4] 2,806.4

TOTAL 23,593.9


This is not the only marketplace where the tax/technology intersection is problematical. On a far larger scale MTIC (missing trader intra-community) fraud is also a technology driven theft of public revenue by criminals. These frauds include the well known carousel frauds in cell phones and computer chips, MTIC fraud in CO2 permits, the yet to be fully investigated VoIP MTIC, as well as MTIC in the electricity and gas exchanges.

Tax authorities are fighting back all along the technology front. There are intensive traditional audits as well as concerted efforts to blunt the effectiveness of the fraud with technology. But, if there is one distinguishing characteristic of Zapper enforcement efforts it is that here the authorities are embracing technology-based solutions. This effort to fight technology-with-technology has produced a measure of success as well as helped develop strategic partnerships around solutions. Cooperation is evident.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: Zapper, VAT Fraud, BMC, Inc., Sales Recording Module, eTax, Sales Data Controller

JEL Classification: H00, H20, H26, K34, K42, O23, O33

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 26, 2010 ; Last revised: March 9, 2010

Suggested Citation

Ainsworth, Richard Thompson, Zappers - Retail VAT Fraud (February 26, 2010). Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 10-04. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1559886 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1559886

Contact Information

Richard Thompson Ainsworth (Contact Author)
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
NYU - Graduate Tax Program ( email )
Bobst Library, E-resource Acquisitions
20 Cooper Square 3rd Floor
New York, NY 10003-711
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,201
Downloads: 331
Download Rank: 50,090
Footnotes:  60

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.250 seconds