Legitimacy and Deterrence Effects in Counter-Terrorism Policing: A Study of Muslim Americans
Yale University - Law School
New York University School of Law
Aziz Z. Huq
University of Chicago - Law School
February 26, 2010
Law and Society Review, Forthcoming
U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 296
NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 10-15
This study considers the circumstances under which members of the Muslim American community voluntarily cooperate with police efforts to combat terrorism. Cooperation is defined to include both a general receptivity toward helping the police in anti-terror work, and the specific willingness to alert police to terror related risks in a community. Two perspectives on why people cooperate with law enforcement, both developed with reference to general policing, are compared in the context of anti-terror policing and specifically among members of the Muslim American community. The first is instrumental. It suggests that people cooperate because they see tangible benefits that outweigh any costs. The second perspective is normative. It posits that people respond to their belief that police are a legitimate authority. On this view legitimacy is linked to the fairness and procedural justice of police procedures. Data from a study involving interviews with Muslim Americans in New York City between March and June 2009 strongly support the normative model by finding that the procedural justice of police activities is the primary factor shaping legitimacy and cooperation with the police.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 42
Date posted: March 1, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.343 seconds