Abstract

 


 



No Risk Allocation Need Apply: The Twisted Minnesota Law of Indemnification


Daniel S. Kleinberger


William Mitchell College of Law

1987

William Mitchell Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 777-842, 1987
William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1987-01

Abstract:     
Minnesota's law on indemnification agreements is the most restrictive in the country. To provide a basis for understanding the law's restrictions, this Article begins with an analysis of the rationale and functions of indemnification agreements. The Article then reviews the hostility of both the common and statutory law to indemnification agreements and argues that opponents of indemnification have acted without convincing reasons or supporting evidence in substituting government rules for private decision-making.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 69

Keywords: Contracts, Indemnification, Construction, Personal Injury, Workers' Compensation, Negligence, Indemnity, Strict Construction, Contribution, risk allocation, insurance, CGL

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 28, 2010 ; Last revised: March 4, 2010

Suggested Citation

Kleinberger, Daniel S., No Risk Allocation Need Apply: The Twisted Minnesota Law of Indemnification (1987). William Mitchell Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 777-842, 1987; William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1987-01. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1559960

Contact Information

Daniel S. Kleinberger (Contact Author)
William Mitchell College of Law ( email )
875 Summit Ave
St. Paul, MN 55105-3076
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 401
Downloads: 58
Download Rank: 188,896

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.407 seconds