Abstract

 
 

References (53)



 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



Public-Private Partnerships Versus Traditional Procurement: Innovation Incentives and Information Gathering


Eva I. Hoppe


University of Cologne - Department of Economics

Patrick W. Schmitz


University of Cologne; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

October 15, 2012


Abstract:     
A government agency wants a facility to be built and managed to provide a public service. Two different modes of provision are considered. In a public-private partnership, the tasks of building and managing are bundled, whereas under traditional procurement, these tasks are delegated to separate private contractors. The two provision modes differ in their incentives to innovate and to gather private information about future costs to adapt the service provision to changing circumstances. The government agency's preferred mode of provision depends on the information gathering costs, the costs of innovation efforts, and on the degree to which effort is contractible.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: Public-Private Partnerships, Integration Versus Separation, Information Gathering, Incomplete Contracts

JEL Classification: D86, L33, H11

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 28, 2010 ; Last revised: October 15, 2012

Suggested Citation

Hoppe, Eva I. and Schmitz, Patrick W., Public-Private Partnerships Versus Traditional Procurement: Innovation Incentives and Information Gathering (October 15, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1560487 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1560487

Contact Information

Eva I. Hoppe
University of Cologne - Department of Economics ( email )
Cologne, 50923
Germany
Patrick W. Schmitz (Contact Author)
University of Cologne ( email )
Albertus-Magnus-Platz
Cologne, 50923
Germany
HOME PAGE: http://schmitz.uni-koeln.de/index.php?s=mitarbeiter&t=schmitz
Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)
77 Bastwick Street
London, EC1V 3PZ
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 899
Downloads: 378
Download Rank: 36,274
References:  53
Citations:  3
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.453 seconds