Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1561372
 
 

Footnotes (173)



 


 



The Greater Good or Property Rights? Resolving the Tension between Positive and Negative Rights in Eminent Domain


Bran Frederick Mahoney


George Mason University - School of Law

February 28, 2010


Abstract:     
This paper examines the background of takings law and differing philosophical viewpoints on individual rights. It then analyzes the balance of rights in the present use of eminent domain, and proposes solutions to current problems with eminent domain and the possible impact of these solutions on the balance of positive and negative rights.

Special attention is given to the status of blight and economic takings after Kelo v. City of New London, and what the jurisprudence in this area means for the balance of rights in the nation as a whole.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: Kelo v. City of New London, Eminent Domain, Positive Rights, Negative Rights, Civil Rights, Takings, Condemnation, Takings Clause, Just Compensation, Negative Liberty, Positive Liberty, Isaiah Berlin, Berman v. Parker, Steven J. Eagle, Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff, Blight takings

JEL Classification: K11

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 5, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Mahoney, Bran Frederick, The Greater Good or Property Rights? Resolving the Tension between Positive and Negative Rights in Eminent Domain (February 28, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1561372 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1561372

Contact Information

Bran Frederick Mahoney (Contact Author)
George Mason University - School of Law ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 507
Downloads: 106
Download Rank: 150,209
Footnotes:  173

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.250 seconds